So Cole sacrifices himself and takes in the Hollow to save Pheobe, Piper and Prue (or was it Paige?), which then makes him vulnerable to evil, which is why the Source is then reincarnated/reborn in Cole. Cole tries everything to fight it, and even considers killing himself to try and stop the…
^
Exactly what I thought and it enraged me so much when they did this. Cole did so much for the sisters and they just turned their back on him. I still believe they should’ve saved him and Phoebe should’ve ended up with him.
(Source: the-rising-wolves)
A while back, I read Tina Fey’s Proust questionnaire in Vanity Fair, in which she said that she deplores when people are proud of their ignorance and dislikes when education is seen as elitist. I did a silent (but understandably unreturned) fist-bump to her for finally saying it out loud, in the…
Sherlock Holmes, a brilliant pimp with superior observation and deduction skills, uncovers the mystery of gruesome crimes that the CSI team, including Investigator Lestrade, has trouble solving.
Sherlock Holmes is accompanied by his sexy blonde femme fatale, whom he has just recently met after…
(Source: clevergenius)
TUMBLR!
WHY DON’T YOU SEND ME MY EMAIL NOTIFICATIONS?!?!?! I WANT THEM THAT’S WHY I CLICKED ENABLE ON THEM!!!!!!!
(Source: hathorz)
I’m sick and tired of people acting like it’s no big deal that Chris Brown will be performing at the Grammys.
I’m frustrated that the mainstream media is covering this story like it’s any comeback story, like an exiled prince’s return to a former glory, like this is another political timeline — as though some rich and powerful old white men in the music business have not just issued an enormous ‘f**k you’ to every woman who has been, is or will be on the receiving end of domestic violence.
We should be furious.
Why aren’t we?
A Long, Long Time Ago, or Three Years Ago, But Who’s Counting?
For those of you who are currently listening to ‘Look at Me Now’ and wondering what the big deal is, a quick recap: The night before the Grammys in 2009, Chris Brown got angry at his girlfriend, Rihanna, and he took it out on her face. She went to the hospital and then to the LAPD, where this photo was taken and promptly leaked to TMZ. (The LAPD issued a stern statement on the leak, threatening penalties “up to and including termination”. TMZ reportedly paid $62,500 for the photo.)
Both Rihanna and Brown had been scheduled to perform at the Grammys the following evening. Neither did.
Instead, Chris Brown turned himself into the LAPD at 7 pm, was booked on suspicion of criminal threats and was released on $50,000 bail.
Then the Internet exploded.
I was a full-time entertainment writer at the time, so I had a front-row seat to the action. This is what I expected: I expected a string of celebrities to comment on how horrific this situation was, how sad and angry they were for Rihanna, how domestic violence is unacceptable in any context, how as a nation we need to condemn this and condemn it loudly.
Instead, Hollywood went silent and, when they did speak, they teetered on the brink of defending Chris Brown.
Carrie Underwood: “I don’t think anybody actually knows what happened. I have no advice.”
Lindsay Lohan: “I have no comment on that. That’s not my relationship. I think they’re both great people.”
Nia Long: “I know both of them well. They’re young, and all we can do is pray for them at this point.”
Mary J. Blige: “They’re both young and beautiful people, and that’s it.”
Jay-Z, one of Rihanna’s mentors, spoke up: “You have to have compassion for others. Just imagine it being your sister or mom and then think about how we should talk about that. I just think we should all support her.”
In a sane world, Jay-Z’s statement would sound insane. Why would he have to remind his fans to support Rihanna after what happened is that she got hit in the face?
Jay-Z issued that statement because the Internet was, in early February 2009, engaged in a very serious conversation about whether or not all of this was Rihanna’s fault. In fact, large segments of the Internet had devoted themselves to making Rihanna the scapegoat for any woman who ever had the gall to do something worth getting hit, and then the cloying self-esteem to go to the cops about it. Bloggers and their commentators flocked to Chris Brown’s defense in droves. It was a full-blown tearing-down of female self-worth, an assault on any progress women have made in this country in the past 200 years, and the mainstream media ignored it.
It horrified me. It still does.
Later in February, a photo of Brown riding a jet ski in Miami hit the Internet, and singer Usher was caught on video commenting on it: “I’m a little disappointed in this photo,” Usher says in the video. “After the other photo [of Rihanna’s bruised face]? C’mon, Chris. Have a little bit of remorse, man. The man’s on jet skis? Like, just relaxing in Miami?”
The backlash was so severe that Usher was later forced to publicly apologize.
“I apologize on behalf of myself and my friends if anyone was offended,” he said. “The intentions were not to pass judgment and we meant no harm. I respect and wish the best for all parties involved.”
The message we sent to young women was unmistakable: You are powerless. You are worthless. You will be a victim, and that will be okay with us.
The Fall-out, and the Lack Thereof
In August 2009, Brown was sentenced to five years probation and 180 hours of community service after pleading guilty to felony assault.
In December 2009, he released his third studio album. It sold over 100,000 copies in its first week and debuted at #7 on the Billboard charts.
On June 8, 2010, Brown was forced to cancel his tour dates in the UK when the British Home Office refused to grant him a work visa on the grounds of “being guilty of a serious criminal offence”. Less than three weeks later, he performed ‘Man in the Mirror’ at the BET Awards’ tribute to Michael Jackson.
His fourth studio album, released in March of last year, debuted at #1.
In December 2011, Billboard crowned him their artist of the year.
And, this week, Grammy producers confirmed that Chris Brown will be performing on Sunday’s show.
“We’re glad to have him back,” said executive producer Ken Ehrlich. “I think people deserve a second chance, you know. If you’ll note, he has not been on the Grammys for the past few years and it may have taken us a while to kind of get over the fact that we were the victim of what happened.”
Read that quote again. Think hard about what is being said. Here is what this quote says to any woman who’s ever been abused:
- By blacklisting Chris Brown from the Grammys for a “few” years (actually, a grand total of TWO Grammy Awards), the Grammys have gone above and beyond expectations for the social exile of an adult man who hit his girlfriend so hard she went to the hospital, and honestly it was really, really hard for them to show even that much support for victims of domestic violence worldwide.
- It was rather thoughtless of Rihanna to go and get herself hit in the face by her boyfriend, because it’s put such a burden on the Grammys. Maybe if she hadn’t made such a big fuss out of it, things could have been easier for everyone.
- The Grammys think that they were the victim of Chris Brown hitting Rihanna in the face.
- The Grammys. Think. That they. Were the victim. Of Chris Brown. Hitting. Rihanna. In the face.
Hitting People Is Wrong, Y’All
I agree that people deserve a second chance. It’s great that we live in a country with a justice system that allows offenders to reclaim themselves and their lives after their sentence. I’m happy about that, and I hope Brown is a changed man at the end of his sentence. (The US justice system has Chris Brown on probation through 2014. It was nice of the Grammys to let him off a couple years early for
high record salesgood behavior.)And my suspicion is that Rihanna has no interest in being a poster child for victims of domestic violence. She probably wishes this would all disappear, and I don’t blame her for a minute. She didn’t ask for this – for any of it – and she’s under no obligation to speak out about it.
But someone has to. Because what is happening here is unmistakable. It is, in my eyes, so unmistakable that I wonder if I’m wrong, if I’m missing something huge, because I cannot believe more voices aren’t railing against this.
We – the grown-up influencers in this country, the people with platforms and with educations and with power — are allowing a clear message to be sent to women: We will easily forgive a person who victimizes you. We are able to look beyond the fact that you were treated as less than human, that a bigger, stronger person decided to resolve a conflict with you through violence. We know it happened, but it’s just not that big of a deal to us.
We were so mad when the Komen Foundation pulled its funding for breast cancer screenings at Planned Parenthood. “This is not fair,” we shouted. “This is not fair to women, and this is not fair to the women who don’t have a voice, and we will not allow it.” We shouted it so loudly that Komen reversed its decision in three days. We forced the resignation of one of their top executives.
Planned Parenthood, no doubt, has a well-funded and fine-tuned PR machine, adept at galvanizing a population against a perceived injustice. They outmaneuvered Komen easily.
Does domestic violence have a less sophisticated PR machine than Chris Brown does?
Because to me, this situation isn’t all that different. Accepting that Chris Brown gets to perform at the Grammys because some people bought his album is no different from accepting that women without health insurance don’t get to be screened for breast cancer because some VP at Komen is anti-abortion. It may happen, but that doesn’t mean we should tacitly accept it. What if Chris Brown had hit your sister that night? Or your daughter? (What if Chris Brown had hit Taylor Swift that night?)
We’re accepting the message that women just aren’t that important, that their health and their safety and their self-respect is only important until it stops being convenient for everyone. We should be angry about this, and we should be angry publicly about this.
So I want to say this to anyone who is listening: This is not okay with me. A man hitting a woman in anger is unacceptable and is not easily forgotten or forgiven. A man who hits a woman in anger deserves to be reported to the authorities and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, regardless of who might be inconvenienced in the process. A man who hits a woman in anger may eventually be permitted to go on with his own life, but he is not permitted back in my life, even if it’s been three whole years.
Wow. Just, wow.
I didn’t realize that he was performing, and that quote from the Grammys producer makes me sick.
I never make a point of ever watching the Grammys, but this year I’m definitely boycotting it.
Kaiba vs. Stairs
- Kaiba:
- Kaiba:
- Kaiba:
- Kaiba:
- Kaiba:
- Kaiba:
- Kaiba:
- Kaiba:
- Kaiba:
- Kaiba:
- Kaiba:
- Kaiba:
“It annoys me when Jack Skellington is almost always seen as a depressive character and nothing else. There is so much more to his personality than that. Jack is passionate, inquisitive, friendly, a good leader, a little overconfident, a little naive, eager, open-minded, heroic, a bit eccentric, and spooky in a harmless way. He is only genuinely unhappy during a couple of short scenes in the film; otherwise, he’s a pretty cheerful and round character. “
Some quotes:
2. Its too violent. Like people die in every book, i mean its just depressing! and good guys die too!! I mean lupin, fred (one of the best characters), tonks, etc. I mean little kinds and people shoudn’t have to read that kind of thing! that teaches people that death is ok and natural! I mean who WANTS to read about that kind of thing?
4. Its british. British stuff is never as good as american stuff. America is the top country in the world. I mean, im not trying to brag or anything, but its just a fact that america is the most advanced and powerful country in the world. Twilight is American, Harry Potter is british. Therefore, by logic, Twilight is better. And just because Twilight is american automatically makes it higher quality, just because its America, no matter what you think of the book. I mean, British people can be really bad, like they fought against us and LOST in WW2, right? So seriously, they just aren’t as good.
And Dumbledore is creepy too. He has a beard, beards are creepy! And he has a mustache too, that makes him look like hes evil!! We all know beards are creepy, and he wears a freaking DRESS! THATS SICK, MEN DO NOT WEAR DRESSES!!!!!!!! Also hes gay. thats creepy because hes so old! Old peopla rent supposed to be gay! nothin against homosexals, btw.
I really hope this is a joke. Because if it’s not, this person needs to check herself before she wrecks herself. It’s just ridiculous. There is no way to compare Harry Potter and Twilight, really, because it’s two separate genres. It’s like comparing apples to oranges.
I really hope this is a joke because I just bowed my head in shame at this person… did you even go to school and get educated? Hope they know British have some amazing works of literature, they change words in books when publishing it in other countries to make sense to that culture, the movies rank among the top grossing films, the main villain has depth and an interesting back story, the main characters have depth and great personalities and realistic looks described (Bella was left slightly bland so others could relate to her in Twilight), observably they don’t know world history, and of course there’s going to be a dark overtone when mentioning anything death eater/ Voldemort related. Sorry if I sound like an ass, but this annoyed me…
“I mean, im not trying to brag or anything, but its just a fact that america is the most advanced and powerful country in the world.”
Actually, they’re not the most advanced country in the world. They may invent some innovations, but they are by no means the most advanced country in the world. Take a trip around Europe and some of the cities in Asian countries to see what I mean. Not to mention their power is on the back of their military strength, which is causing so much debt that China basically owns them now.
“I mean, British people can be really bad, like they fought against us and LOST in WW2, right”
Has this person ever paid attention in a history lesson? Have they not heard of Hitler and Stalin? Their obvious bigotry evokes so many emotions….
This person’s use of “logic” is so flawed, my 5 year old cousin would laugh at this “exposition” (and of course, I doubt the composer would know what an exposition is). Their “English” so abhorrent Stephenie Meyer would consider it a masterpiece.
(Source: gryffinwhore-love)
My friend put this on fb and I thought I’d reply here rather than start a full on war there. Edit: I started a war on there anyway and won lol
”There are several ways to avoid loving God: Deny that you are a sinner. Pretend that religion is for the ignorant and the superstitious but not for the truly learned such as yourself. Insist that the sole purpose of religion is social service. Judge religion by whether or not it is accepted by the important people of the world. Avoid all contemplation, self-examination, and inquiry into the moral state of your soul. ~ Archbishop Fulton Sheen
1. A sin is defined as follows: “A sin is an act that violates a known moral rule in a religion.” Using that definition and going by any religion in the world, we are all sinners. Any one who denies this fact is deluded.
2. “Pretend that religion is for the ignorant and the superstitious but not for the truly learned such as yourself.”
Studies have shown that as your IQ increases, the lower the chance of you believing in organised religion. That is a fact, a statistic that has been observed and cannot be disputed. Even if the sample space was small, there is a large multitude of studies confirming this trend. Therefore, the use of the word “pretend” is moot - these studies could be used as evidence to the contrary.
Aside from this, there are obvious reasons as to why people shy away from religion. A lot of it has to do with injustices such organisations or people associated with them have committed both in the past and now. It may also have to do with the obviously hypocritical beliefs a lot of these these organisations have. Those do not see this are blind or choose to ignore/forget it.
Also, you should note that a belief in God is completely different to a belief in religion. So how on earth would not being a part of an organised religion stop you from “loving God”? I suppose if you are biased against religion, you would be inclined not to believe their pious babbling and hence God. But, belief is just that - it is a belief. You either have it or you don’t so not believing in religion should not affect you either way.
3. Religion is not simply a social service. It is also a social disservice in numerous ways and has always been. It also gives people structure. It gives them “answers” so that they do not need to think for themselves. This is a fact - I have seen this from first hand experience. Additionally, you can do social service out of the goodness of your own heart, religion is not required. There are simply a lot of religious social services, but that does not mean religion = social service.
4. Most of our world leaders are religious, very few of them admit to being athiest. So this is clearly not a problem. I suppose the point is that a lot of people are becoming disenchanted with religion. But, as I mentioned before, this is not to be confused with not believing in God.
5. I’m quite sure repentance requires you to examine your actions ie what you did ie what your soul did.
In conclusion, I do none of the things he said would lead to me avoiding “loving God”. But, I am a weak atheist who simply does not have God in my life. God’s existence or non-existence has no real affect on my life. Aside of course, the impact other people have on me due to their belief in/disbelief in/apathy towards God.
/rant
This is what I am going do to the sad excuse of a lecturer I have.
His thinking process must’ve be something like this: “Let’s make these kids do a blood long-arse journal, with half the marks being based on how they formatted the fricken thing. Oh and let’s make it reflective, because as engineers, they’ll need to reflect on the imaginary content that I won’t ever teach them. I’ll also expect them to do extra research on machines they won’t need to know about and random things like ergonomics just for kicks.”
Oh, and we are not allowed to “lecture” i.e. make notes about the tiny bits of information he actually did teach us. Yes, a reflective journal is going to help us with our end of semester exam which is based on the imaginary content we were never taught.
Honestly, how did the idiot become a lecturer? AVADA KEDAVRA.
Via Malfeito,feito
This was on this Pottermore confessions blog: http://confessionspottermore.tumblr.com
OMG LOOK SLYTHERIN!!! ORLY?
This (the picture above^) was posted after this one (below):
Glad you prove the sorting hats reliability better. But honestly, why did you guys make so many…




